Skip to main content

The member benefits of market consolidation

8 May, 2024
clock 5 MIN READ

It would seem ‘consolidation’ is presently the word on every pension professional’s lips. A red thread running through Chancellor Jeremy Hunt’s 2023 Mansion House speech and Autumn Statement, the Regulator recently acknowledged the impact of market consolidation in undeniably stark terms: 

‘The pensions landscape is rapidly evolving towards a competitive marketplace of fewer, larger schemes… present(ing) different risks and opportunities for savers and the economy alike.’1

That consolidation creates both risks and opportunities cannot be overstated. And whilst the commercial benefits should be obvious enough, moving thousands of savers from one pension provision to another has the potential to be very, very disruptive. From the perspective of savers, are the potential rewards worth the short-term pain? And is there a way of avoiding said pain altogether?   

In this short commentary, we look back at our acquisition of the Atlas Master Trust—a deal we completed in 2021. In doing so, we argue firstly that consolidation within the master trust marketplace can improve member outcomes, and secondly that consolidation doesn’t necessarily need to be disruptive. A robust transition process is all it takes to bridge the void between one provider and another. 


Master trust market consolidation: Top-three potential member benefits

Before getting into the details, it’s worth reiterating what consolidation—and master trust consolidation, specifically—means for members. Here are the top three benefits, as we see it:
 

#1  The stability of a truly committed provider

The process of acquiring a master trust is far from easy (take it from us!) As such, providers looking to grow through acquisition are not just expressing ambition, they’re expressing a significant commitment to the market. 

This should provide some peace of mind. Joining a master trust that’s made this kind of commitment reduces future uncertainty—incoming members should be confident that their new provider has every intention of being around for years to come. 

#2 – The potential for better net investment returns

The larger the master trust, the greater the economies of scale at play. As a master trust grows in assets under management, the provider stands to negotiate better third-party rates, reducing their overheads. These cost savings can then be passed down. 

This is as important for legacy members as it is members joining a new master trust post-acquisition. Any fee reduction could enhance net investment returns, leading to better retirement outcomes for all. 

#3 – The best of two master trusts in one solution

Acquiring a master trust isn’t about doing away with everything that made that master trust unique. More often than not, the process offers a provider the opportunity to develop and enhance their proposition. 

Taking a ‘best of both’ approach not only ensures a degree of continuity for incoming members, it can just as easily lead to service improvements for legacy members.   

Learn more about Master Trust

Providing 360 degree governance to DC schemes.

Interested in finding out more?

Nicky Benstead

Client Director, Defined Contribution

1‘The Pensions Regulator makes strategic shift in its oversight of the workplace pensions market’, The Pensions Regulator, 22 February 2024. 

Important Information
This is a Marketing Communication. This webpage has been created in relation to the SEI Master Trust, an occupational pension scheme which is authorised by the Pensions Regulator. The trustee of the SEI Master Trust is SEI Trustees Limited. SEI Trustees Limited has appointed SEI Investments (Europe) Ltd (“SIEL”) as investment adviser to the SEI Master Trust and pursuant to its investment advisory agreement. This information is issued and approved by SEI Investments (Europe) Ltd (“SIEL”) 1st Floor, Alphabeta, 14-18 Finsbury Square, London EC2A 1BR. This webpage and its contents are directed at persons who have been categorised by SIEL as a Professional Client and is not for further distribution. SIEL is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. While considerable care has been taken to ensure the information contained within this webpage is accurate and up-to-date and complies with relevant legislation and regulations, no warranty is given and no representation is made as to the accuracy or completeness of any information and no liability is accepted for any errors or omissions in such information or any action taken on the basis of this information. The information in this webpage is for general information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. You should read all the investment information and details on the funds before making investment choices. Please refer to our latest Prospectus (which includes information in relation to the use of derivatives and the risks associated with the use of derivative instruments), Key Investor Information Document, PRIIPs KID, Summary of UCITS Shareholder rights (which includes a summary of the rights that shareholders of our funds have) and the latest Annual or Semi-Annual Reports for more information on our funds, which can be located at Fund Documents (https://seic.com/en-gb/fund-documents). And you should read the terms and conditions contained in the Prospectus (including the risk factors) before making any investment decision. If you are in any doubt about whether or how to invest, you should seek independent advice before making any decisions. The UCITS may be de-registered for sale in an EEA jurisdiction in accordance with the provisions of the UCITS Directive. Past Performance does not predict future returns. Investment in the range of the SEI Master Trust’s funds are intended as a long-term investment. The value of an investment and any income from it can go down as well as up. Investors may not get back the original amount invested. This document and its contents are for Institutional Investors only and not for further distribution.

This case study describes the attributes of a specific client that SEI has determined is comparable based on objective criteria, including organisational goals, assets size and industry sector. Any discussion of specific asset allocations is intended to help clients understand SEI’s customised investment approach, and should not be regarded as a recommendation. Information concerning SEI’s recommendations over the last year is available on request. The information express herein represents the current, good faith views of SEI at the time of original publication, and has not been updated.